Social Security Crisis: New Plan Could Tax High Earners To Prevent 21% Benefit Cut – Financial Freedom Countdown
The United States is facing a fiscal double-whammy: a ballooning federal budget deficit and a Social Security trust fund racing toward depletion. With the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) releasing new numbers on potential fixes, one option is gaining significant attention: uncapping the Social Security payroll tax.
The $1.8 Trillion Elephant in the Room

The federal government is currently operating deep in the red. For Fiscal Year 2025, the federal budget deficit hit roughly $1.8 trillion. To put that in perspective, the government is borrowing approximately $5 billion every single day just to keep the lights on and pay its obligations.

Social Security is the single largest line item in the federal budget, accounting for over one-fifth of all spending. While the program is technically “off-budget” and funded by its own trust funds, its finances are deeply intertwined with the nation’s fiscal health. Since 2021, Social Security has been running a cash-flow deficit, meaning it pays out more in benefits than it collects in taxes. In 2024 alone, the program had to redeem roughly $67 billion from its trust funds to cover the gap.
The 2033 Insolvency Cliff

The clock is ticking. According to the 2024 Social Security Trustees Report, the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund; the one that pays retirement benefits is projected to be depleted by 2033. If the Disability Insurance fund is combined with it, the date pushes out slightly to 2035.
Once these reserves are gone, Social Security can only pay out what it brings in via tax revenue. Without congressional action, this would trigger an automatic, across-the-board benefit cut of roughly 17% to 21% for all beneficiaries.
The CBO’s Solution: Taxing High Earners

The CBO recently analyzed a budget option that would fundamentally change how Social Security is funded: Increasing the Maximum Taxable Earnings. Currently, in 2024, workers only pay Social Security taxes on their first $168,600 of earnings. Any money earned above that cap is tax-free for Social Security purposes.
The CBO outlines two distinct alternatives to change this, both of which target high-income earners.
Option 1: The “90% Standard”

The first alternative proposes raising the taxable maximum so that 90% of all earnings in the economy are subject to the tax. Under current law, only about 82% of covered earnings are taxed. To hit this 90% target in 2025, the cap would need to jump significantly; from the current projected levels to roughly $305,100.
Financial Impact of Option 1
Raising the cap to cover 90% of earnings would bring in substantial revenue. The CBO estimates this move would reduce the federal deficit by $727.6 billion over the next decade (2025–2034).
However, because Social Security benefits are based on contributions, these high earners would also earn higher future benefits, which would eventually offset some of the revenue gains in the long term.
Option 2: The “Donut Hole” Approach

The second alternative is more aggressive. It keeps the current taxable maximum where it is but adds a new tax on all earnings over $250,000. This creates a “donut hole”; a gap where earnings between the current cap (e.g., $168,600) and $250,000 remain untaxed, but everything above $250,000 is taxed at the full 12.4% rate.
Why Option 2 Saves More Money
Over time, as the standard cap rises with inflation, it would eventually meet the $250,000 threshold, eliminating the donut hole entirely by roughly 2036. The CBO estimates this approach would reduce the deficit by a staggering $1.4 trillion over ten years; nearly double the savings of Option 1.
Does It Fix Solvency?

While these changes generate massive revenue, they are not a silver bullet. Under Option 1, the CBO projects the Social Security trust funds’ exhaustion date would be extended by about 3 years; moving the crisis from the mid-2030s to the late 2030s. It buys time, but it doesn’t permanently solve the shortfall.
Impact on High Earners

For high-income professionals, these changes would mean a significant tax hike. A self-employed individual earning $400,000, for example, would see their tax bill rise by tens of thousands of dollars annually under Option 2, as the full 12.4% tax would apply to their income above $250,000.
The Trade-Off: Higher Taxes vs. Benefit Cuts

The debate ultimately comes down to a choice: raise revenue or cut benefits. With the insolvency date less than a decade away, policymakers are running out of time to implement gradual changes.
The CBO’s report makes it clear that stabilizing the system will likely require substantial contributions from the nation’s highest earners.
The Path Forward: Gridlock or Grand Bargain?

While the CBO has provided the roadmap, the vehicle for change; Congress, is currently stalled. Passing legislation to uncap the Social Security tax would require navigating a deeply polarized political landscape.
With a split Congress, the “do nothing” option is the path of least resistance, but it carries the highest price.
If lawmakers remain deadlocked and fail to act before the trust funds run dry in the early 2030s, the law mandates an automatic cut in benefits. This would result in an immediate loss of purchasing power for millions of seniors, potentially plunging many into poverty and sending a shockwave through the broader economy.
The window for a “gradual” fix is closing; the longer Congress waits, the more drastic and painful the eventual solution will be.
Like Financial Freedom Countdown content? Be sure to follow us!
The $270,000 Retirement Trap: Vanguard Says You’re Planning for Health Care Costs All Wrong

Health care costs in retirement are consistently cited as the single greatest financial worry for pre-retirees and retirees. Experts, like those at the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI), have quantified the savings needed for a 65-year-old couple at a daunting $270,000 to cover total health care premiums and out-of-pocket costs throughout retirement (excluding long-term care). However, new research from Vanguard, in partnership with Mercer Health & Benefits, suggests that focusing on this large, lifetime lump sum is not only overwhelming but also the wrong way to plan.
The $270,000 Retirement Trap: Vanguard Says You’re Planning for Health Care Costs All Wrong
Trump Signals Interest in Australia’s ‘Super’ Retirement System; A Mandatory 12% Employer Contribution Could Upend U.S. Savings

President Donald Trump sparked a national debate after saying the Australian retirement system is a “good plan” that has “worked out very well,” adding that the administration is “looking at it very seriously.” His comments raised the question: Could the U.S. pivot away from its aging retirement model and adopt components of Australia’s mandatory “superannuation” program?
Seniors Receiving Their COLA Notices This Week Are Shocked As the 2.8% Raise Already ‘Wiped Out’ by Rising Costs

Most older Americans say the much-anticipated 2.8% Social Security cost-of-living adjustment for 2026 is already falling short. As COLA letters land in mailboxes this week, a striking 77% of Americans age 50 and over tell AARP the increase doesn’t come close to matching real inflation; and experts warn that rising Medicare premiums could wipe out what little boost retirees are getting.
Trump Accounts Just Got a $6.25 Billion Boost And Here’s How Kids Could Become Millionaires

President Trump’s signature “One Big Beautiful Bill” created tax-advantaged “Trump Accounts” to give American children an investment-powered jumpstart in life. The program just expanded dramatically after Michael and Susan Dell announced a $6.25 billion donation; a contribution large enough to fund $250 deposits for 25 million children across the country.
Trump Accounts Just Got a $6.25 Billion Boost And Here’s How Kids Could Become Millionaires

Did you find this article helpful? We’d love to hear your thoughts! Leave a comment with the box on the left-hand side of the screen and share your thoughts.
Also, do you want to stay up-to-date on our latest content?
1. Follow us by clicking the [+ Follow] button above,
2. Give the article a Thumbs Up on the top-left side of the screen.
3. And lastly, if you think this information would benefit your friends and family, don’t hesitate to share it with them!

John Dealbreuin came from a third world country to the US with only $1,000 not knowing anyone; guided by an immigrant dream. In 12 years, he achieved his retirement number.
He started Financial Freedom Countdown to help everyone think differently about their financial challenges and live their best lives. John resides in the San Francisco Bay Area enjoying nature trails and weight training.
Here are his recommended tools
Personal Capital: This is a free tool John uses to track his net worth on a regular basis and as a retirement planner. It also alerts him wrt hidden fees and has a budget tracker included.
Platforms like Yieldstreet provide investment options in art, legal, real estate, structured notes, venture capital, etc. They also have fixed-income portfolios spread across multiple asset classes with a single investment with low minimums of $10,000.
